WARNING: Version 6.0 of Elasticsearch has passed its EOL date.
This documentation is no longer being maintained and may be removed. If you are running this version, we strongly advise you to upgrade. For the latest information, see the current release documentation.
Percolator type
editPercolator type
editThe percolator
field type parses a json structure into a native query and
stores that query, so that the percolate query
can use it to match provided documents.
Any field that contains a json object can be configured to be a percolator
field. The percolator field type has no settings. Just configuring the percolator
field type is sufficient to instruct Elasticsearch to treat a field as a
query.
If the following mapping configures the percolator
field type for the
query
field:
PUT my_index { "mappings": { "doc": { "properties": { "query": { "type": "percolator" }, "field": { "type": "text" } } } } }
Then you can index a query:
PUT my_index/doc/match_value { "query" : { "match" : { "field" : "value" } } }
Fields referred to in a percolator query must already exist in the mapping
associated with the index used for percolation. In order to make sure these fields exist,
add or update a mapping via the create index or put mapping APIs.
Fields referred in a percolator query may exist in any type of the index containing the percolator
field type.
Reindexing your percolator queries
editReindexing percolator queries is sometimes required to benefit from improvements made to the percolator
field type in
new releases.
Reindexing percolator queries can be reindexed by using the reindex api. Lets take a look at the following index with a percolator field type:
PUT index { "mappings": { "doc" : { "properties": { "query" : { "type" : "percolator" }, "body" : { "type": "text" } } } } } POST _aliases { "actions": [ { "add": { "index": "index", "alias": "queries" } } ] } PUT queries/doc/1?refresh { "query" : { "match" : { "body" : "quick brown fox" } } }
It is always recommended to define an alias for your index, so that in case of a reindex systems / applications don’t need to be changed to know that the percolator queries are now in a different index. |
Lets say you’re going to upgrade to a new major version and in order for the new Elasticsearch version to still be able to read your queries you need to reindex your queries into a new index on the current Elasticsearch version:
PUT new_index { "mappings": { "doc" : { "properties": { "query" : { "type" : "percolator" }, "body" : { "type": "text" } } } } } POST /_reindex?refresh { "source": { "index": "index" }, "dest": { "index": "new_index" } } POST _aliases { "actions": [ { "remove": { "index" : "index", "alias": "queries" } }, { "add": { "index": "new_index", "alias": "queries" } } ] }
Executing the percolate
query via the queries
alias:
GET /queries/_search { "query": { "percolate" : { "field" : "query", "document" : { "body" : "fox jumps over the lazy dog" } } } }
now returns matches from the new index:
{ "took": 3, "timed_out": false, "_shards": { "total": 5, "successful": 5, "skipped" : 0, "failed": 0 }, "hits": { "total": 1, "max_score": 0.2876821, "hits": [ { "_index": "new_index", "_type": "doc", "_id": "1", "_score": 0.2876821, "_source": { "query": { "match": { "body": "quick brown fox" } } } } ] } }
Optimizing query time text analysis
editWhen the percolator verifies a percolator candidate match it is going to parse, perform query time text analysis and actually run
the percolator query on the document being percolated. This is done for each candidate match and every time the percolate
query executes.
If your query time text analysis is relatively expensive part of query parsing then text analysis can become the
dominating factor time is being spent on when percolating. This query parsing overhead can become noticeable when the
percolator ends up verifying many candidate percolator query matches.
To avoid the most expensive part of text analysis at percolate time. One can choose to do the expensive part of text analysis
when indexing the percolator query. This requires using two different analyzers. The first analyzer actually performs
text analysis that needs be performed (expensive part). The second analyzer (usually whitespace) just splits the generated tokens
that the first analyzer has produced. Then before indexing a percolator query, the analyze api should be used to analyze the query
text with the more expensive analyzer. The result of the analyze api, the tokens, should be used to substitute the original query
text in the percolator query. It is important that the query should now be configured to override the analyzer from the mapping and
just the second analyzer. Most text based queries support an analyzer
option (match
, query_string
, simple_query_string
).
Using this approach the expensive text analysis is performed once instead of many times.
Lets demonstrate this workflow via a simplified example.
Lets say we want to index the following percolator query:
{ "query" : { "match" : { "body" : { "query" : "missing bicycles" } } } }
with these settings and mapping:
PUT /test_index { "settings": { "analysis": { "analyzer": { "my_analyzer" : { "tokenizer": "standard", "filter" : ["lowercase", "porter_stem"] } } } }, "mappings": { "doc" : { "properties": { "query" : { "type": "percolator" }, "body" : { "type": "text", "analyzer": "my_analyzer" } } } } }
First we need to use the analyze api to perform the text analysis prior to indexing:
POST /test_index/_analyze { "analyzer" : "my_analyzer", "text" : "missing bicycles" }
This results the following response:
{ "tokens": [ { "token": "miss", "start_offset": 0, "end_offset": 7, "type": "<ALPHANUM>", "position": 0 }, { "token": "bicycl", "start_offset": 8, "end_offset": 16, "type": "<ALPHANUM>", "position": 1 } ] }
All the tokens in the returned order need to replace the query text in the percolator query:
PUT /test_index/doc/1?refresh { "query" : { "match" : { "body" : { "query" : "miss bicycl", "analyzer" : "whitespace" } } } }
It is important to select a whitespace analyzer here, otherwise the analyzer defined in the mapping will be used,
which defeats the point of using this workflow. Note that |
The analyze api prior to the indexing the percolator flow should be done for each percolator query.
At percolate time nothing changes and the percolate
query can be defined normally:
GET /test_index/_search { "query": { "percolate" : { "field" : "query", "document" : { "body" : "Bycicles are missing" } } } }
This results in a response like this:
{ "took": 6, "timed_out": false, "_shards": { "total": 5, "successful": 5, "skipped" : 0, "failed": 0 }, "hits": { "total": 1, "max_score": 0.2876821, "hits": [ { "_index": "test_index", "_type": "doc", "_id": "1", "_score": 0.2876821, "_source": { "query": { "match": { "body": { "query": "miss bicycl", "analyzer": "whitespace" } } } } } ] } }
Optimizing wildcard queries.
editWildcard queries are more expensive than other queries for the percolator, especially if the wildcard expressions are large.
In the case of wildcard
queries with prefix wildcard expressions or just the prefix
query,
the edge_ngram
token filter can be used to replace these queries with regular term
query on a field where the edge_ngram
token filter is configured.
Creating an index with custom analysis settings:
PUT my_queries1 { "settings": { "analysis": { "analyzer": { "wildcard_prefix": { "type": "custom", "tokenizer": "standard", "filter": [ "standard", "lowercase", "wildcard_edge_ngram" ] } }, "filter": { "wildcard_edge_ngram": { "type": "edge_ngram", "min_gram": 1, "max_gram": 32 } } } }, "mappings": { "query": { "properties": { "query": { "type": "percolator" }, "my_field": { "type": "text", "fields": { "prefix": { "type": "text", "analyzer": "wildcard_prefix", "search_analyzer": "standard" } } } } } } }
The analyzer that generates the prefix tokens to be used at index time only. |
|
Increase the |
|
This multifield should be used to do the prefix search
with a |
Then instead of indexing the following query:
{ "query": { "wildcard": { "my_field": "abc*" } } }
this query below should be indexed:
PUT /my_queries1/query/1?refresh { "query": { "term": { "my_field.prefix": "abc" } } }
This way can handle the second query more efficiently than the first query.
The following search request will match with the previously indexed percolator query:
GET /my_queries1/_search { "query": { "percolate": { "field": "query", "document": { "my_field": "abcd" } } } }
{ "took": 6, "timed_out": false, "_shards": { "total": 5, "successful": 5, "skipped": 0, "failed": 0 }, "hits": { "total": 1, "max_score": 0.41501677, "hits": [ { "_index": "my_queries1", "_type": "query", "_id": "1", "_score": 0.41501677, "_source": { "query": { "term": { "my_field.prefix": "abc" } } } } ] } }
The same technique can also be used to speed up suffix
wildcard searches. By using the reverse
token filter
before the edge_ngram
token filter.
PUT my_queries2 { "settings": { "analysis": { "analyzer": { "wildcard_suffix": { "type": "custom", "tokenizer": "standard", "filter": [ "standard", "lowercase", "reverse", "wildcard_edge_ngram" ] }, "wildcard_suffix_search_time": { "type": "custom", "tokenizer": "standard", "filter": [ "standard", "lowercase", "reverse" ] } }, "filter": { "wildcard_edge_ngram": { "type": "edge_ngram", "min_gram": 1, "max_gram": 32 } } } }, "mappings": { "query": { "properties": { "query": { "type": "percolator" }, "my_field": { "type": "text", "fields": { "suffix": { "type": "text", "analyzer": "wildcard_suffix", "search_analyzer": "wildcard_suffix_search_time" } } } } } } }
A custom analyzer is needed at search time too, because otherwise the query terms are not being reversed and would otherwise not match with the reserved suffix tokens. |
Then instead of indexing the following query:
{ "query": { "wildcard": { "my_field": "*xyz" } } }
the following query below should be indexed:
The |
The following search request will match with the previously indexed percolator query:
GET /my_queries2/_search { "query": { "percolate": { "field": "query", "document": { "my_field": "wxyz" } } } }
Dedicated Percolator Index
editPercolate queries can be added to any index. Instead of adding percolate queries to the index the data resides in, these queries can also be added to a dedicated index. The advantage of this is that this dedicated percolator index can have its own index settings (For example the number of primary and replica shards). If you choose to have a dedicated percolate index, you need to make sure that the mappings from the normal index are also available on the percolate index. Otherwise percolate queries can be parsed incorrectly.
Forcing Unmapped Fields to be Handled as Strings
editIn certain cases it is unknown what kind of percolator queries do get registered, and if no field mapping exists for fields
that are referred by percolator queries then adding a percolator query fails. This means the mapping needs to be updated
to have the field with the appropriate settings, and then the percolator query can be added. But sometimes it is sufficient
if all unmapped fields are handled as if these were default text fields. In those cases one can configure the
index.percolator.map_unmapped_fields_as_text
setting to true
(default to false
) and then if a field referred in
a percolator query does not exist, it will be handled as a default text field so that adding the percolator query doesn’t
fail.
Limitations
editParent/child
editBecause the percolate
query is processing one document at a time, it doesn’t support queries and filters that run
against child documents such as has_child
and has_parent
.
Fetching queries
editThere are a number of queries that fetch data via a get call during query parsing. For example the terms
query when
using terms lookup, template
query when using indexed scripts and geo_shape
when using pre-indexed shapes. When these
queries are indexed by the percolator
field type then the get call is executed once. So each time the percolator
query evaluates these queries, the fetches terms, shapes etc. as the were upon index time will be used. Important to note
is that fetching of terms that these queries do, happens both each time the percolator query gets indexed on both primary
and replica shards, so the terms that are actually indexed can be different between shard copies, if the source index
changed while indexing.
Script query
editThe script inside a script
query can only access doc values fields. The percolate
query indexes the provided document
into an in-memory index. This in-memory index doesn’t support stored fields and because of that the _source
field and
other stored fields are not stored. This is the reason why in the script
query the _source
and other stored fields
aren’t available.