Functional Testing

edit

We use functional tests to make sure the Kibana UI works as expected. It replaces hours of manual testing by automating user interaction. To have better control over our functional test environment, and to make it more accessible to plugin authors, Kibana uses a tool called the FunctionalTestRunner.

Running functional tests

edit

The FunctionalTestRunner is very bare bones and gets most of its functionality from its config file, located at test/functional/config.js. If you’re writing a plugin you will have your own config file. See Functional Tests for Plugins for more info.

There are three ways to run the tests depending on your goals:

  1. Easiest option:

    • Description: Starts up Kibana & Elasticsearch servers, followed by running tests. This is much slower when running the tests multiple times because slow startup time for the servers. Recommended for single-runs.
    • yarn test:ui

      • does everything in a single command, including running Elasticsearch and Kibana locally
      • tears down everything after the tests run
      • exit code reports success/failure of the tests
  2. Best for development:

    • Description: Two commands, run in separate terminals, separate the components that are long-running and slow from those that are ephemeral and fast. Tests can be re-run much faster, and this still runs Elasticsearch & Kibana locally.
    • yarn test:ui:server

      • starts Elasticsearch and Kibana servers
      • slow to start
      • can be reused for multiple executions of the tests, thereby saving some time when re-running tests
      • automatically restarts the Kibana server when relevant changes are detected
    • node scripts/functional_test_runner

      • runs the tests against Kibana & Elasticsearch servers that were started yarn test:ui:server
      • exit code reports success or failure of the tests
  3. Custom option:

    • Description: Runs tests against instances of Elasticsearch & Kibana started some other way (like Elastic Cloud, or an instance you are managing in some other way).
    • just executes the functional tests
    • url, credentials, etc. for Elasticsearch and Kibana are specified via environment variables
    • Here’s an example that runs against an Elastic Cloud instance. Note that you should run the same branch of tests as the version of Kibana you’re testing.

      export TEST_KIBANA_URL=https://kibana:password@my-kibana-instance.internal.net:443
      
      export TEST_ES_URL=https://elastic:password@my-es-cluster.internal.net:9200
      node scripts/functional_test_runner
    • Or you can override any or all of these individual parts of the URL and leave the others to the default values.

      export TEST_KIBANA_PROTOCOL=https
      export TEST_KIBANA_HOSTNAME=my-kibana-instance.internal.net
      export TEST_KIBANA_PORT=443
      export TEST_KIBANA_USER=kibana
      export TEST_KIBANA_PASS=<password>
      
      export TEST_ES_PROTOCOL=http
      export TEST_ES_HOSTNAME=my-es-cluster.internal.net
      export TEST_ES_PORT=9200
      export TEST_ES_USER=elastic
      export TEST_ES_PASS=<password>
      node scripts/functional_test_runner
More about node scripts/functional_test_runner
edit

When run without any arguments the FunctionalTestRunner automatically loads the configuration in the standard location, but you can override that behavior with the --config flag.

There are also command line flags for --bail and --grep, which behave just like their mocha counterparts. For instance, use --grep=foo to run only tests that match a regular expression.

Logging can also be customized with --quiet, --debug, or --verbose flags.

Use the --help flag for more options.

Writing functional tests

edit
Environment
edit

The tests are written in mocha using expect for assertions.

We use chromedriver, leadfoot, and digdug for automating Chrome. When the FunctionalTestRunner launches, digdug opens a Tunnel which starts chromedriver and a stripped-down instance of Chrome. It also creates an instance of Leadfoot’s Command class, which is available via the remote service. The remote communicates to Chrome through the digdug Tunnel. See the leadfoot/Command API docs for all the commands you can use with remote.

The FunctionalTestRunner automatically transpiles functional tests using babel, so that tests can use the same ECMAScript features that Kibana source code uses. See style_guides/js_style_guide.md.

Definitions
edit

Provider:

Code run by the FunctionalTestRunner is wrapped in a function so it can be passed around via config files and be parameterized. Any of these Provider functions may be asynchronous and should return/resolve-to the value they are meant to provide. Provider functions will always be called with a single argument: a provider API (see the Provider API Section).

A config provder:

// config and test files use `export default`
export default function (/* { providerAPI } */) {
  return {
    // ...
  }
}
Services
Services are named singleton values produced by a Service Provider. Tests and other services can retrieve service instances by asking for them by name. All functionality except the mocha API is exposed via services.\
Page objects
Page objects are a special type of service that encapsulate behaviors common to a particular page or plugin. When you write your own plugin, you’ll likely want to add a page object (or several) that describes the common interactions your tests need to execute.
Test Files
The FunctionalTestRunner's primary purpose is to execute test files. These files export a Test Provider that is called with a Provider API but is not expected to return a value. Instead Test Providers define a suite using mocha’s BDD interface.
Test Suite
A test suite is a collection of tests defined by calling describe(), and then populated with tests and setup/teardown hooks by calling it(), before(), beforeEach(), etc. Every test file must define only one top level test suite, and test suites can have as many nested test suites as they like.
Anatomy of a test file
edit

The annotated example file below shows the basic structure every test suite uses. It starts by importing expect.js and defining its default export: an anonymous Test Provider. The test provider then destructures the Provider API for the getService() and getPageObjects() functions. It uses these functions to collect the dependencies of this suite. The rest of the test file will look pretty normal to mocha.js users. describe(), it(), before() and the lot are used to define suites that happen to automate a browser via services and objects of type PageObject.

import expect from 'expect.js';
// test files must `export default` a function that defines a test suite
export default function ({ getService, getPageObject }) {

  // most test files will start off by loading some services
  const retry = getService('retry');
  const testSubjects = getService('testSubjects');
  const esArchiver = getService('esArchiver');

  // for historical reasons, PageObjects are loaded in a single API call
  // and returned on an object with a key/value for each requested PageObject
  const PageObjects = getPageObjects(['common', 'visualize']);

  // every file must define a top-level suite before defining hooks/tests
  describe('My Test Suite', () => {

    // most suites start with a before hook that navigates to a specific
    // app/page and restores some archives into elasticsearch with esArchiver
    before(async () => {
      await Promise.all([
        // start with an empty .kibana index
        esArchiver.load('empty_kibana'),
        // load some basic log data only if the index doesn't exist
        esArchiver.loadIfNeeded('makelogs')
      ]);
      // go to the page described by `apps.visualize` in the config
      await PageObjects.common.navigateTo('visualize');
    });

    // right after the before() hook definition, add the teardown steps
    // that will tidy up elasticsearch for other test suites
    after(async () => {
      // we unload the empty_kibana archive but not the makelogs
      // archive because we don't make any changes to it, and subsequent
      // suites could use it if they call `.loadIfNeeded()`.
      await esArchiver.unload('empty_kibana');
    });

    // This series of tests illustrate how tests generally verify
    // one step of a larger process and then move on to the next in
    // a new test, each step building on top of the previous
    it('Vis Listing Page is empty');
    it('Create a new vis');
    it('Shows new vis in listing page');
    it('Opens the saved vis');
    it('Respects time filter changes');
    it(...
  });

}

Provider API

edit

The first and only argument to all providers is a Provider API Object. This object can be used to load service/page objects and config/test files.

Within config files the API has the following properties

log

An instance of the ToolingLog that is ready for use

readConfigFile(path)

Returns a promise that will resolve to a Config instance that provides the values from the config file at path

Within service and PageObject Providers the API is:

getService(name)

Load and return the singleton instance of a service by name

getPageObjects(names)

Load the singleton instances of `PageObject`s and collect them on an object where each name is the key to the singleton instance of that PageObject

Within a test Provider the API is exactly the same as the service providers API but with an additional method:

loadTestFile(path)

Load the test file at path in place. Use this method to nest suites from other files into a higher-level suite

Service Index

edit
Built-in Services
edit

The FunctionalTestRunner comes with three built-in services:

config:
log:
  • Source: src/utils/tooling_log/tooling_log.js
  • ToolingLog instances are readable streams. The instance provided by this service is automatically piped to stdout by the FunctionalTestRunner CLI
  • log.verbose(), log.debug(), log.info(), log.warning() all work just like console.log but produce more organized output
lifecycle:
  • Source: src/functional_test_runner/lib/lifecycle.js
  • Designed primary for use in services
  • Exposes lifecycle events for basic coordination. Handlers can return a promise and resolve/fail asynchronously
  • Phases include: beforeLoadTests, beforeTests, beforeEachTest, cleanup, phaseStart, phaseEnd
Kibana Services
edit

The Kibana functional tests define the vast majority of the actual functionality used by tests.

retry:
  • Source: test/functional/services/retry.js
  • Helpers for retrying operations
  • Popular methods:

    • retry.try(fn) - execute fn in a loop until it succeeds or the default try timeout elapses
    • retry.tryForTime(ms, fn) execute fn in a loop until it succeeds or ms milliseconds elapses
testSubjects:
  • Source: test/functional/services/test_subjects.js
  • Test subjects are elements that are tagged specifically for selecting from tests
  • Use testSubjects over CSS selectors when possible
  • Usage:

    • Tag your test subject with a data-test-subj attribute:

      <div id="container”>
        <button id="clickMe” data-test-subj=”containerButton” />
      </div>
    • Click this button using the testSubjects helper:

      await testSubjects.click(‘containerButton’);
  • Popular methods:

    • testSubjects.find(testSubjectSelector) - Find a test subject in the page; throw if it can’t be found after some time
    • testSubjects.click(testSubjectSelector) - Click a test subject in the page; throw if it can’t be found after some time
find:
  • Source: test/functional/services/find.js
  • Helpers for remote.findBy* methods that log and manage timeouts
  • Popular methods:

    • find.byCssSelector()
    • find.allByCssSelector()
kibanaServer:
esArchiver:
docTable:
pointSeriesVis:
Low-level utilities:
Custom Services
edit

Services are intentionally generic. They can be literally anything (even nothing). Some services have helpers for interacting with a specific types of UI elements, like pointSeriesVis, and others are more foundational, like log or config. Whenever you want to provide some functionality in a reusable package, consider making a custom service.

To create a custom service somethingUseful:

  • Create a test/functional/services/something_useful.js file that looks like this:

    // Services are defined by Provider functions that receive the ServiceProviderAPI
    export function SomethingUsefulProvider({ getService }) {
      const log = getService('log');
    
      class SomethingUseful {
        doSomething() {
        }
      }
      return new SomethingUseful();
    }
  • Re-export your provider from services/index.js
  • Import it into src/functional/config.js and add it to the services config:

    import { SomethingUsefulProvider } from './services';
    
    export default function () {
      return {
        // … truncated ...
        services: {
          somethingUseful: SomethingUsefulProvider
        }
      }
    }

PageObjects

edit

The purpose for each PageObject is pretty self-explanatory. The visualize PageObject provides helpers for interacting with the visualize app, dashboard is the same for the dashboard app, and so on.

One exception is the "common" PageObject. A holdover from the intern implementation, the common PageObject is a collection of helpers useful across pages. Now that we have shareable services, and those services can be shared with other FunctionalTestRunner configurations, we will continue to move functionality out of the common PageObject and into services.

Please add new methods to existing or new services rather than further expanding the CommonPage class.

Gotchas

edit

Remember that you can’t run an individual test in the file (it block) because the whole describe needs to be run in order. There should only be one top level describe in a file.

Functional Test Timing
edit

Another important gotcha is writing stable tests by being mindful of timing. All methods on remote run asynchronously. It’s better to write interactions that wait for changes on the UI to appear before moving onto the next step.

For example, rather than writing an interaction that simply clicks a button, write an interaction with the a higher-level purpose in mind:

Bad example: PageObjects.app.clickButton()

class AppPage {
  // what can people who call this method expect from the
  // UI after the promise resolves? Since the reaction to most
  // clicks is asynchronous the behavior is dependant on timing
  // and likely to cause test that fail unexpectedly
  async clickButton () {
    await testSubjects.click(‘menuButton’);
  }
}

Good example: PageObjects.app.openMenu()

class AppPage {
  // unlike `clickButton()`, callers of `openMenu()` know
  // the state that the UI will be in before they move on to
  // the next step
  async openMenu () {
    await testSubjects.click(‘menuButton’);
    await testSubjects.exists(‘menu’);
  }
}

Writing in this way will ensure your test timings are not flaky or based on assumptions about UI updates after interactions.

Debugging

edit

From the command line run:

node --debug-brk --inspect scripts/functional_test_runner

This prints out a URL that you can visit in Chrome and debug your functional tests in the browser.

You can also see additional logs in the terminal by running the FunctionalTestRunner with the --debug or --verbose flag. Add more logs with statements in your tests like

// load the log service
const log = getService(‘log’);

// log.debug only writes when using the `--debug` or `--verbose` flag.
log.debug(‘done clicking menu’);