Highlighting

The default choice of highlighter is of type plain and uses the Lucene highlighter. It tries hard to reflect the query matching logic in terms of understanding word importance and any word positioning criteria in phrase queries.

If index_options is set to offsets in the mapping the postings highlighter will be used instead of the plain highlighter. The postings highlighter:

Here is an example of setting the content field to allow for highlighting using the postings highlighter on it:

{
    "type_name" : {
        "content" : {"index_options" : "offsets"}
    }
}

If term_vector information is provided by setting term_vector to with_positions_offsets in the mapping then the fast vector highlighter will be used instead of the plain highlighter. The fast vector highlighter:

Here is an example of setting the content field to allow for highlighting using the fast vector highlighter on it (this will cause the index to be bigger):

{
    "type_name" : {
        "content" : {"term_vector" : "with_positions_offsets"}
    }
}

The type field allows to force a specific highlighter type. This is useful for instance when needing to use the plain highlighter on a field that has term_vectors enabled. The allowed values are: plain, postings and fvh. The following is an example that forces the use of the plain highlighter:

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {"type" : "plain"}
        }
    }
}

Forces the highlighting to highlight fields based on the source even if fields are stored separately. Defaults to false.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {"force_source" : true}
        }
    }
}

By default, the highlighting will wrap highlighted text in <em> and </em>. This can be controlled by setting pre_tags and post_tags, for example:

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "pre_tags" : ["<tag1>"],
        "post_tags" : ["</tag1>"],
        "fields" : {
            "_all" : {}
        }
    }
}

Using the fast vector highlighter there can be more tags, and the "importance" is ordered.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "pre_tags" : ["<tag1>", "<tag2>"],
        "post_tags" : ["</tag1>", "</tag2>"],
        "fields" : {
            "_all" : {}
        }
    }
}

There are also built in "tag" schemas, with currently a single schema called styled with the following pre_tags:

<em class="hlt1">, <em class="hlt2">, <em class="hlt3">,
<em class="hlt4">, <em class="hlt5">, <em class="hlt6">,
<em class="hlt7">, <em class="hlt8">, <em class="hlt9">,
<em class="hlt10">

and </em> as post_tags. If you think of more nice to have built in tag schemas, just send an email to the mailing list or open an issue. Here is an example of switching tag schemas:

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "tags_schema" : "styled",
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {}
        }
    }
}

An encoder parameter can be used to define how highlighted text will be encoded. It can be either default (no encoding) or html (will escape html, if you use html highlighting tags).

Each field highlighted can control the size of the highlighted fragment in characters (defaults to 100), and the maximum number of fragments to return (defaults to 5). For example:

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {"fragment_size" : 150, "number_of_fragments" : 3}
        }
    }
}

The fragment_size is ignored when using the postings highlighter, as it outputs sentences regardless of their length.

On top of this it is possible to specify that highlighted fragments need to be sorted by score:

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "order" : "score",
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {"fragment_size" : 150, "number_of_fragments" : 3}
        }
    }
}

If the number_of_fragments value is set to 0 then no fragments are produced, instead the whole content of the field is returned, and of course it is highlighted. This can be very handy if short texts (like document title or address) need to be highlighted but no fragmentation is required. Note that fragment_size is ignored in this case.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "fields" : {
            "_all" : {},
            "bio.title" : {"number_of_fragments" : 0}
        }
    }
}

When using fast-vector-highlighter one can use fragment_offset parameter to control the margin to start highlighting from.

In the case where there is no matching fragment to highlight, the default is to not return anything. Instead, we can return a snippet of text from the beginning of the field by setting no_match_size (default 0) to the length of the text that you want returned. The actual length may be shorter than specified as it tries to break on a word boundary. When using the postings highlighter it is not possible to control the actual size of the snippet, therefore the first sentence gets returned whenever no_match_size is greater than 0.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {
                "fragment_size" : 150,
                "number_of_fragments" : 3,
                "no_match_size": 150
            }
        }
    }
}

It is also possible to highlight against a query other than the search query by setting highlight_query. This is especially useful if you use a rescore query because those are not taken into account by highlighting by default. Elasticsearch does not validate that highlight_query contains the search query in any way so it is possible to define it so legitimate query results aren’t highlighted at all. Generally it is better to include the search query in the highlight_query. Here is an example of including both the search query and the rescore query in highlight_query.

{
    "fields": [ "_id" ],
    "query" : {
        "match": {
            "content": {
                "query": "foo bar"
            }
        }
    },
    "rescore": {
        "window_size": 50,
        "query": {
            "rescore_query" : {
                "match_phrase": {
                    "content": {
                        "query": "foo bar",
                        "phrase_slop": 1
                    }
                }
            },
            "rescore_query_weight" : 10
        }
    },
    "highlight" : {
        "order" : "score",
        "fields" : {
            "content" : {
                "fragment_size" : 150,
                "number_of_fragments" : 3,
                "highlight_query": {
                    "bool": {
                        "must": {
                            "match": {
                                "content": {
                                    "query": "foo bar"
                                }
                            }
                        },
                        "should": {
                            "match_phrase": {
                                "content": {
                                    "query": "foo bar",
                                    "phrase_slop": 1,
                                    "boost": 10.0
                                }
                            }
                        },
                        "minimum_should_match": 0
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Note that the score of text fragment in this case is calculated by the Lucene highlighting framework. For implementation details you can check the ScoreOrderFragmentsBuilder.java class. On the other hand when using the postings highlighter the fragments are scored using, as mentioned above, the BM25 algorithm.

Highlighting settings can be set on a global level and then overridden at the field level.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "number_of_fragments" : 3,
        "fragment_size" : 150,
        "tag_schema" : "styled",
        "fields" : {
            "_all" : { "pre_tags" : ["<em>"], "post_tags" : ["</em>"] },
            "bio.title" : { "number_of_fragments" : 0 },
            "bio.author" : { "number_of_fragments" : 0 },
            "bio.content" : { "number_of_fragments" : 5, "order" : "score" }
        }
    }
}

require_field_match can be set to false which will cause any field to be highlighted regardless of whether the query matched specifically on them. The default behaviour is true, meaning that only fields that hold a query match will be highlighted.

{
    "query" : {...},
    "highlight" : {
        "require_field_match": false
        "fields" : {...}
    }
}

When highlighting a field using the fast vector highlighter, boundary_chars can be configured to define what constitutes a boundary for highlighting. It’s a single string with each boundary character defined in it. It defaults to .,!? \t\n.

The boundary_max_scan allows to control how far to look for boundary characters, and defaults to 20.

The Fast Vector Highlighter can combine matches on multiple fields to highlight a single field using matched_fields. This is most intuitive for multifields that analyze the same string in different ways. All matched_fields must have term_vector set to with_positions_offsets but only the field to which the matches are combined is loaded so only that field would benefit from having store set to yes.

In the following examples content is analyzed by the english analyzer and content.plain is analyzed by the standard analyzer.

{
    "query": {
        "query_string": {
            "query": "content.plain:running scissors",
            "fields": ["content"]
        }
    },
    "highlight": {
        "order": "score",
        "fields": {
            "content": {
                "matched_fields": ["content", "content.plain"],
                "type" : "fvh"
            }
        }
    }
}

The above matches both "run with scissors" and "running with scissors" and would highlight "running" and "scissors" but not "run". If both phrases appear in a large document then "running with scissors" is sorted above "run with scissors" in the fragments list because there are more matches in that fragment.

{
    "query": {
        "query_string": {
            "query": "running scissors",
            "fields": ["content", "content.plain^10"]
        }
    },
    "highlight": {
        "order": "score",
        "fields": {
            "content": {
                "matched_fields": ["content", "content.plain"],
                "type" : "fvh"
            }
        }
    }
}

The above highlights "run" as well as "running" and "scissors" but still sorts "running with scissors" above "run with scissors" because the plain match ("running") is boosted.

{
    "query": {
        "query_string": {
            "query": "running scissors",
            "fields": ["content", "content.plain^10"]
        }
    },
    "highlight": {
        "order": "score",
        "fields": {
            "content": {
                "matched_fields": ["content.plain"],
                "type" : "fvh"
            }
        }
    }
}

The above query wouldn’t highlight "run" or "scissor" but shows that it is just fine not to list the field to which the matches are combined (content) in the matched fields.

    "highlight": {
        "fields": {
            "content": {}
        }
    }

    "highlight": {
        "fields": {
            "content": {
                "matched_fields": ["content"],
                "type" : "fvh"
            }
        }
    }

The fast-vector-highlighter has a phrase_limit parameter that prevents it from analyzing too many phrases and eating tons of memory. It defaults to 256 so only the first 256 matching phrases in the document scored considered. You can raise the limit with the phrase_limit parameter but keep in mind that scoring more phrases consumes more time and memory.

If using matched_fields keep in mind that phrase_limit phrases per matched field are considered.

Elasticsearch highlights the fields in the order that they are sent. Per the json spec objects are unordered but if you need to be explicit about the order that fields are highlighted then you can use an array for fields like this:

    "highlight": {
        "fields": [
            {"title":{ /*params*/ }},
            {"text":{ /*params*/ }}
        ]
    }

None of the highlighters built into Elasticsearch care about the order that the fields are highlighted but a plugin may.